<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" 
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Comments on: The Person Component]]></title>
    <link><![CDATA[http://chinesepod.com/lessons/the-person-component/discussion]]></link>
    <description><![CDATA[Do you see Chinese characters as a bunch of squiggly lines that can only be learned by rote memorization? Wouldn't it be great if someone could teach you how to look at them methodically, component by component? The concept is revolutionary, it's righteous, it's Radical! ]]></description>
    <pubDate>2009-12-16 21:00:00</pubDate>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[By: pearltowerpete]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://chinesepod.com/lessons/the-person-component/discussion#comment-103747]]></link>
        <author><![CDATA[pearltowerpete]]></author>
        <pubDate></pubDate>
        <guid><![CDATA[#comment-103747]]></guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Hi <strong>poddies</strong>,</p>
<p>What other bodacious radicals would you like to see as guest stars on this rip-roaring new show?</p>]]></description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi <strong>poddies</strong>,</p>
<p>What other bodacious radicals would you like to see as guest stars on this rip-roaring new show?</p>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[By: jennyzhu]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://chinesepod.com/lessons/the-person-component/discussion#comment-103750]]></link>
        <author><![CDATA[jennyzhu]]></author>
        <pubDate></pubDate>
        <guid><![CDATA[#comment-103750]]></guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Are you guys trying to bring back the 80's? Great video!!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you guys trying to bring back the 80's? Great video!!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[By: John]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://chinesepod.com/lessons/the-person-component/discussion#comment-103751]]></link>
        <author><![CDATA[John]]></author>
        <pubDate></pubDate>
        <guid><![CDATA[#comment-103751]]></guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>This show is all about component parts, so the real value will come when more of them have been introduced. Coming soon...</p>]]></description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This show is all about component parts, so the real value will come when more of them have been introduced. Coming soon...</p>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[By: chanelle77]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://chinesepod.com/lessons/the-person-component/discussion#comment-103752]]></link>
        <author><![CDATA[chanelle77]]></author>
        <pubDate></pubDate>
        <guid><![CDATA[#comment-103752]]></guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>My &ldquo;favorite radicals&rdquo; are 龠 and 犭 but I think it would be very interesting and useful to do them all!</p>
<p>Off topic: this morning I was in the waiting room of a Chinese dentist (first time and really nervous) and was reading a random magazine and there was an article about John&rsquo;s (work) day. That was a pleasant distraction! CPod is everywhere ;-). Btw, nice show!</p>]]></description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My &ldquo;favorite radicals&rdquo; are 龠 and 犭 but I think it would be very interesting and useful to do them all!</p>
<p>Off topic: this morning I was in the waiting room of a Chinese dentist (first time and really nervous) and was reading a random magazine and there was an article about John&rsquo;s (work) day. That was a pleasant distraction! CPod is everywhere ;-). Btw, nice show!</p>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[By: changye]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://chinesepod.com/lessons/the-person-component/discussion#comment-103753]]></link>
        <author><![CDATA[changye]]></author>
        <pubDate></pubDate>
        <guid><![CDATA[#comment-103753]]></guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>To say the least, there is so much room for improvement.</p>]]></description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To say the least, there is so much room for improvement.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[By: henning]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://chinesepod.com/lessons/the-person-component/discussion#comment-103756]]></link>
        <author><![CDATA[henning]]></author>
        <pubDate></pubDate>
        <guid><![CDATA[#comment-103756]]></guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I just didn't get it because I am not a native English speaker. Too bad, the actual topic (lasting 30 seconds of the 5-minutes video?) could indeed be really interesting.</p>]]></description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I just didn't get it because I am not a native English speaker. Too bad, the actual topic (lasting 30 seconds of the 5-minutes video?) could indeed be really interesting.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[By: urbandweller]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://chinesepod.com/lessons/the-person-component/discussion#comment-103757]]></link>
        <author><![CDATA[urbandweller]]></author>
        <pubDate></pubDate>
        <guid><![CDATA[#comment-103757]]></guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>hmmmmm...still making up my mind about this one...</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmmmm...still making up my mind about this one...</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[By: billglover]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://chinesepod.com/lessons/the-person-component/discussion#comment-103758]]></link>
        <author><![CDATA[billglover]]></author>
        <pubDate></pubDate>
        <guid><![CDATA[#comment-103758]]></guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Looking forward to this series. I've hit a limit with character memorisation precisely because I'm learning them by trying to memorise their appearance.</p>
<p>This works ok when you only know a few characters, but I've hit the 60ish character mark and I'm confusing characters all over the place.</p>
<p>Downloading now.</p>]]></description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking forward to this series. I've hit a limit with character memorisation precisely because I'm learning them by trying to memorise their appearance.</p>
<p>This works ok when you only know a few characters, but I've hit the 60ish character mark and I'm confusing characters all over the place.</p>
<p>Downloading now.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[By: John]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://chinesepod.com/lessons/the-person-component/discussion#comment-103763]]></link>
        <author><![CDATA[John]]></author>
        <pubDate></pubDate>
        <guid><![CDATA[#comment-103763]]></guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>All discussion and criticism is welcome.</p>
<p>A quick note, though: this series is meant for Newbies, presented as an alternate way to look at characters.</p>
<p>You'll notice we never use the word "radical" in reference to parts of characters (which are called 部件 (b&ugrave;ji&agrave;n)). This is because both the word "radical" in English and 偏旁 (piānp&aacute;ng) in Chinese are historically linked with archaic classification systems rooted in a need for dictionary organization. Computers are changing everthing, however. "Radicals" are no longer essential for looking up characters; we have copy-paste and handwriting recognition. This is where the 部件 (b&ugrave;ji&agrave;n) concept comes in: deconstructing characters for understanding rather than for pure conventional classification.</p>
<p>And yes, it is sort of a radical concept.</p>]]></description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All discussion and criticism is welcome.</p>
<p>A quick note, though: this series is meant for Newbies, presented as an alternate way to look at characters.</p>
<p>You'll notice we never use the word "radical" in reference to parts of characters (which are called 部件 (b&ugrave;ji&agrave;n)). This is because both the word "radical" in English and 偏旁 (piānp&aacute;ng) in Chinese are historically linked with archaic classification systems rooted in a need for dictionary organization. Computers are changing everthing, however. "Radicals" are no longer essential for looking up characters; we have copy-paste and handwriting recognition. This is where the 部件 (b&ugrave;ji&agrave;n) concept comes in: deconstructing characters for understanding rather than for pure conventional classification.</p>
<p>And yes, it is sort of a radical concept.</p>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[By: excalibur]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://chinesepod.com/lessons/the-person-component/discussion#comment-103765]]></link>
        <author><![CDATA[excalibur]]></author>
        <pubDate></pubDate>
        <guid><![CDATA[#comment-103765]]></guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>好久部件！</strong></p>
<p><strong>每个录像一个部件吗？ 哇</strong>。。。This show will be the "Gone With The Wind" of Chinese character writing.</p>
<p>Onward!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>好久部件！</strong></p>
<p><strong>每个录像一个部件吗？ 哇</strong>。。。This show will be the "Gone With The Wind" of Chinese character writing.</p>
<p>Onward!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>
