User Comments - chinatu
chinatu
Posted on: Seeing off a Monk, Returning to Japan -- 送僧归日本
May 9, 2009 at 9:20 AM
上国随缘住,来途若梦行。
浮天沧海远,去世法舟轻。
水月通禅观,鱼龙听梵声。
惟怜一灯影,万里眼中明
韵译:
只要有机缘,随时都可以到中国来;一路雾霭茫茫,船只象在梦中航行。
天海浮沉,小船驶去那遥远的边际;超脱世俗,自然会感受到法舟轻盈。
心境凝定清寂,一切都如水月虚幻;海内鱼龙,也会出来听你诵经之声。
最可爱的是,有盏照亮心田的佛灯;航行万里,眼中永远都是灿烂光明。
Above is a rhymed translation of the original Poem.
bababardwan said What I'm not entirely clear about is the second line and the first half of the 3rd line;whether they are referring to his initial journey to China,or to his return home,and how this is made evident in the poem.Can anyone clarify this?
From my perspective, the second line and the thrid line referr to his rerurn home, furthermore, the whole poem is referring to his return home except the first line. The second line mentioned that the sea was vast and integrated to the sky which was from a Chineses perspective, since China was right here and Japan was far away, China was the Center and Japan was the edge.
上国随缘住,real 来途若梦行。virtual
浮天沧海远,real 去世法舟轻。virtual
水月通禅观,virtual 鱼龙听梵声。virtual
浮天沧海远,real 去世法舟轻。virtual
水月通禅观,virtual 鱼龙听梵声。virtual
惟怜一灯影,real 万里眼中明。virtual
上国随缘住,near 来途若梦行。far
浮天沧海远,far 去世法舟轻。near
水月通禅观,far 鱼龙听梵声。near
浮天沧海远,far 去世法舟轻。near
水月通禅观,far 鱼龙听梵声。near
惟怜一灯影,near 万里眼中明。far
So the Chinese poems carry boundless artistic conception which is not based on Pure Reason (as Kant) And this is the exact charm of the Chinese poem, it might be difficult for those who do not know Chinese Language.
bababardwan raised the question by using a word " initial journey" . I am afraid this is too precise and realistic, which might go against the initial original meaning of the poet!
By Tu WingKing
Bilingual Blog (http//:) chinatu.blogspot.com
Posted on: Seeing off a Monk, Returning to Japan -- 送僧归日本
May 14, 2009 at 7:48 AMThanks, i just provided my personal understanding of the Tang poem. If we strive hard to dig it in depth, we can feel the tiny subtle meaning of it. There is no single word like Return (返回) (the possible criticism may be “去”,去 actually means ‘go back”, but it did not mention “go back to Japan” , it was “去世” which means “to transcend the secular world “ ) sometimes we can see the author even used “来途” in the second line. But we all know this is a “seeing off” poem, why did not the author put it directly? No, the Tang poets would never do so.
And maybe we should bear it in mind that this also a Buddhist poem, and in the Buddhist tradition time is deemed as circular not linear. So should we people in modern time make a clear distinction between the “Come” and “Return”, maybe, yes, we need it in order to understand the poem with a modern mind and interpret it in the context of the ancient time.
The author of the poem disguised the distinction between “come” and “Return” to a large extent. Maybe not only because it was a High-context culture ( compared with the Low-context culture in the West, this is vital to understand this poem) and people prefer not to express their initial idea in a straightforward way (which is considered as “reckless” or “illiterate” ) especial in the artistic world. But also, it is because the very deep abstruse meaning of the Buddhism. For a real Buddhist, the distinction is of no importance, there is no distinction between “come” and ‘return”. How can a religious Buddhist discern the way to the Heaven and the way home? Who by the sea shore saw the distant land-China and who by the other side saw the remote land-Japan? Life has already been a circle of living and dying, let alone the “come’ and “return”. With a Buddhist spirit in our heart, they are all integrated as one (including the physical and spiritual journey) on the way to Buddha and Buddha is anywhere if there is a real Buddhist.
I did not read the poem with a reasonable mind, instead, with an artistic emotional one , maybe neither did the Ancient Chinese readers!
more discussion, welcome to tuwingking@gmail.com
Wingking chinatu.blogspot.com