啊?我还以为这种事情早没了。今年,美国星巴克告上海一家用了相同名字的咖啡店,结果法院判上海星巴克侵权,赔偿50万元,而且立即停止使用这个名字。哎,真没想到,市场上还是有这样的冒牌货。
ā ?wǒ hái yǐwéi zhèzhǒng shìqing zǎo méi le 。jīnnián ,Měiguó xīngbākè gào Shànghǎi yī jiā yòng le xiāngtóng míngzi de kāfēidiàn ,jiéguǒ fǎyuàn pàn Shànghǎi xīngbākè qīnquán ,péicháng wǔshí wàn yuán ,érqiě lìjí tíngzhǐ shǐyòng zhège míngzi 。āi ,zhēn méixiǎngdào ,shìchǎng shàng hái shì yǒu zhèyàngde màopáihuò 。
Huh? I thought that this type of thing wasn’t happening anymore. This year, Starbucks America sued a Shanghai coffee shop that was using the same name. The outcome was that the court ruled that the Shanghai Starbucks infringed on the rights of Starbucks, and had to pay compensation in the amount of 500,000 yuan. Furthermore, they were to immediately stop using the same name. Wow, I had no idea there were still these kinds of imitations on the market.