tones
bababardwan
January 18, 2010, 11:05 PM posted in General DiscussionA couple of silly questions on tones.
Does anyone know if there is an even distribution of tones amongst the characters or if someone has ever done a breakdown and given the percentages.I seem to be noticing a lot of fourth tones lately [maybe cos it's my fav though]?
I also take it there has never been any rhyme or reason to how tones were assigned [presumably because the roots are so ancient].Would have been nice n tidy if all verbs were 4th tone,nouns say first tone,grammar particles neutral,adjectives maybe third tone,question particles 2nd maybe.But keeping us guessing keeps things interesting I s'pose.
bababardwan
thanks John.Yeah,point well taken about the data set.
changye
January 19, 2010, 12:50 PMJust an aside, if you are in China and have interest in Chinese characters, I strongly recommend you get a copy of 《汉字知识与汉字问题》 (Chinese Philology, Knowledge and Issues) published by 商务印书馆 in 2009.
http://product.dangdang.com/product.aspx?product_id=20618393
This is one of the best books on Chinese characters I've ever read, which gives you comprehensive (and concise/exact) knowledges about a lot of issues surrounding Chinese characters.
第一章 汉字是什么时候产生的
第二章 汉字是怎么产生的
第三章 汉字的造字方法
第四章 汉字形体的演变
第五章 汉字的名称
第六章 汉字的数量
第七章 常用的字典和词典
第一章 繁简字的问题
第二章 异体字的问题
第三章 异义字的问题
第四章 异音字的问题
第五章 两组相互混用的字
第六章 异形词的问题
第七章 方言字的问题
第八章 汉字部首的问题
第九章 汉字印刷体字形的问题
第十章 汉字笔画的问题
第十一章 现代汉字规范化的问题
第十二章 写错字的问题
第十三章 读错字的问题
第十四章 汉字形体说解的问题
第十五章 汉字标音的历史
第十六章 汉字书法字体的问题
This book only has 200 pages and written in plain Chinese. Its target readers are Mandarin teachers. I guarantee, with this book you can play a "know-it-all" with regards to Chinese characters, hehe.
Unfortunately, this book doesn't give you information on Chinese phonology.
simonpettersson
January 19, 2010, 04:22 AMMan, seriously? Your fav is the fourth tone? It's terrible! The third tone can beat the fourth tone any day of the week.
bababardwan
how so?
simonpettersson
Well, it's got the tone sandhi rule, for one. It's the only tone that can be repeated without sounding like a broken record. Also, it dips and then rises. That's a pretty awesome tone contour right there, man! Cantonese has tons of rising, falling and level tones, but no dipping tone. And let's not forget that it's the tone that makes you dig deep into your voice register for your masucline baritone sounds. It's the manliest tone, no doubt.
bababardwan
January 19, 2010, 04:27 AMhow so?
changye
January 19, 2010, 04:29 AMYou said "how tones were assigned?", and I must say it's a very difficult question to answer. I think probably there is no significant relationship between tones and parts of speech.
All I can say is that the most common tone is "flat tone" (平声) both in modern and middle Chinese. For the record, the same is true for Cantonese.
In Chinese phonology, first and second tones (in modern Chinese) are called "阴平" and "阳平" respectively, and both were categorized into one group "平声" (flat tone) in rhyme books published in middle China.
In modern Chinese, first (阴平) and second (阳平) tones account for more than fifty percent, and in middle Chinese flat tones (平声) accounted for about forty percent. Do you like flat tone? hehe
bababardwan
Do I like flat tone? Well of course in reality I like 'em all because they all contribute to the musicality of the language.I think the number of tones in Mandarin is perfectly to my liking..enough to give it a musicality and variety without going as far as Cantonese to make it a bigger challenge.But spitting out an emphatic fourth is both easy and satisfying.
bababardwan
January 19, 2010, 04:30 AMthanks changye :) Oh right,sounds like the stop consonants make the diff.Am I right in supposing there is no rationale to the tones?
btw those percentages seem to leave nothing in store for neutral tone.I thought it would be the least frequent but I still wouldn't have had it at zero or a fraction of a percent.
John
January 19, 2010, 04:31 AMChangye,
What is your source? Can you provide a link?
Please remember that there is no "absolute answer" to a question like this... the answer is always dependent on the dataset.
If you're talking about historical data, you're dealing mainly with the written language, which may or may correspond closely to the spoken language, often influenced greatly by dialects.
changye
January 19, 2010, 03:27 AMHere is the distribution of modern tones among 7,366 frequently used Chinese characters.
first tone 1834 (25%)
second tone 1960 (26%)
third tone 1227 (17%)
fourth tone 2345 (32%)
Very roughly speaking, middle Chinese also had similar tendency, although it had so-called "stop consonant" (入声,entering tone), which doesn't exist in modern Mandarin anymore.
In comparison with middle Chinese, modern Mandarin has more fourth tones than middle Chinese, because a lot of 入声 (stop consonant) changed into fourth tone in the past one thousand years.
P/S. Your hunch is right.....fourth tone 32%
bababardwan
thanks changye :) Oh right,sounds like the stop consonants make the diff.Am I right in supposing there is no rationale to the tones?
btw those percentages seem to leave nothing in store for neutral tone.I thought it would be the least frequent but I still wouldn't have had it at zero or a fraction of a percent.
John
Changye,
What is your source? Can you provide a link?
Please remember that there is no "absolute answer" to a question like this... the answer is always dependent on the dataset.
If you're talking about historical data, you're dealing mainly with the written language, which may or may correspond closely to the spoken language, often influenced greatly by dialects.
changye
Hi john
http://chinese.exponode.com/2_3.htm
http://chinese.exponode.com/0_1.htm
There is no trick. The date is based on tones shown in modern dictionaries.
John
Changye,
Thanks! This paper looks really cool... I will have to spend more time on it when I get a chance.
changye
Hi bababardwan
Neutral tone is different from other tones. The tone appears/exists mainly in conversations due to "laziness of speakers". In other words, any character can be pronounced with neutral tone under some conditions.
bababardwan
January 19, 2010, 04:38 AMDo I like flat tone? Well of course in reality I like 'em all because they all contribute to the musicality of the language.I think the number of tones in Mandarin is perfectly to my liking..enough to give it a musicality and variety without going as far as Cantonese to make it a bigger challenge.But spitting out an emphatic fourth is both easy and satisfying.
go_manly
January 19, 2010, 04:41 AMJust did a count on the Jun Da list, and the percentages match Changye's almost exactly, albeit with a higher number of characters.
1st: 2644
2nd: 2769
3rd: 1710
4th: 3395
The total here is 10518, even though there are only 9933 characters in the list. I'm sure you all understand the reason for the discrepancy.
For the record, my favourite tone is the 2nd, least favourite is the first.
changye
You really love counting! Let me call you "The Count" of Chinesepod-street, hehe.
bodawei
Do you not like the first tone because it does not sound manly?
matthiask
Count Count. Awesome pun, doesn't work in German. There he is known as Graf Zahl. His counting is still in my Ears: "Eiiinnnnnsss, Zwaaaaaaaiiiihhh" (eins, zwei ;-) )
orangina
I don't think you meant to say "hehe." I think you meant to say "Ha Ha Ha Ha!!!" (thunder and lightning accompany laugh)
changye
January 19, 2010, 04:57 AMYou really love counting! Let me call you "The Count" of Chinesepod-street, hehe.
bodawei
January 19, 2010, 05:01 AMDo you not like the first tone because it does not sound manly?
changye
January 19, 2010, 05:27 AMHi bababardwan
Neutral tone is different from other tones. The tone appears/exists mainly in conversations due to "laziness of speakers". In other words, any character can be pronounced with neutral tone under some conditions.
orangina
January 19, 2010, 12:01 PMInteresting question baba... I don't think I'd have thought of it. I also favor 4th tone, but 3rd is growing on me, 1st is easy... 2nd is my nemesis.
bababardwan
January 19, 2010, 04:34 AMthanks John.Yeah,point well taken about the data set.
John
January 19, 2010, 03:10 AMBababardwan,
This kind of research has been done, but it all depends on what kind of sample you use to obtain your data. For Chinese, most large corpora are newspaper-based, which may not be entirely representative of the language in general. For tonal distribution, however, it's probably pretty close.
Unfortunately, I don't remember the answer off the top of my head, and the most well-known frequency list, Jun Da's, doesn't seem to have this data.
Here's hoping another poddie has the time to google up this data!