Lesson Comments

Profile picture
Posted on: Asking for a Raise
On February 27 at 12:52 PM by chris

Expansion sentence 2b: 老婆,我的成功也有你的一份功劳. I don't understand the use of "一份".  Is it even necessary, or could we omit it completely from the abov... Read more

Profile picture
On February 27 at 11:53 AM by bababardwan

I was trying to say: oh, young man, you can year the grasshopper at your feet [ your 听错 or cricket was close enough for a pass] . ok, when you can... Read more

Profile picture
Posted on: 中国通
On February 27 at 11:26 AM by ouxiansheng

这节课成堆我老说,不太难。难道我已经变了一个中国通?哈哈 10:33 画面感 14:46 转置 14:50 换一个角度去说 15:30 赔了一分钱也没有了 谢谢! Read more

Profile picture
Posted on: Plans for Children?
On February 27 at 8:53 AM by eliku

Speaking of having babies. When is Jenny coming back? Read more

Profile picture
Posted on: Plans for Children?
On February 27 at 8:04 AM by JasonSch

暧昧 is one of those words that has taken on more meaning than the current dictionary definition reflects. As an adjective it does mean simply, ambiguou... Read more

Profile picture
On February 27 at 5:34 AM by humanitad-china

我自己觉得这个课程特别有用。如果你去图书馆找这种的信息,你就会找不到!这个“请问”肯定是正宗的。这是为什么我以后会花钱用chinesepod学习。 Read more

Profile picture
On February 27 at 5:28 AM by bodawei

Nice to hear a continuation of these interviews with native speakers, particularly ChinesePod staff. It's kinda cool that in the program interviewin... Read more

Profile picture
On February 27 at 5:08 AM by RJ

嗯 takes some getting used to, but the Cpod sound crew does a great job. I have listened as the lesson material evolved from very humble beginings to t... Read more

Profile picture
Posted on: 中国通
On February 27 at 3:07 AM by smallville

谢谢你的恭维。其实,我在大学里学中文学了4年,所以这就是为什么我的中文水平显得那么高。不过,说实在的,这只是在写,读,和听中文的方面上。对我来说,如果我跟你讲中文的话,只说纯粹的中文,你肯定会说得比我更好,因为你每天跟中国人沟通。 反正,只要我们努力去学中文,不怕在语言、文化方面上说错/做错,... Read more

Profile picture
Posted on: Substitute Teacher
On February 27 at 2:43 AM by cowenparkseattle

Next to last sentence in the Expansion: 孩子们 就 在 家里 捣蛋 is translated is "my kid makes trouble".  Is that correct?   Thanks. Read more